WhatIf: Evaluate Counterfactuals

Inferences about counterfactuals are essential for prediction, answering what if questions, and estimating causal effects. However, when the counterfactuals posed are too far from the data at hand, conclusions drawn from well-specified statistical analyses become based largely on speculation hidden in convenient modeling assumptions that few would be willing to defend. Unfortunately, standard statistical approaches assume the veracity of the model rather than revealing the degree of model-dependence, which makes this problem hard to detect. WhatIf offers easy-to-apply methods to evaluate counterfactuals that do not require sensitivity testing over specified classes of models. If an analysis fails the tests offered here, then we know that substantive inferences will be sensitive to at least some modeling choices that are not based on empirical evidence, no matter what method of inference one chooses to use.

Version: 1.5-8
Depends: R (≥ 2.3.1)
Imports: lpSolve, Zelig (≥ 5.0-17)
Suggests: testthat
Published: 2017-03-21
Author: Christopher Gandrud [aut, cre], Gary King [aut], Heather Stoll [aut], Langche Zeng [aut]
Maintainer: Christopher Gandrud <zelig.zee at gmail.com>
BugReports: https://github.com/IQSS/WhatIf/issues
License: GPL (≥ 3)
URL: http://gking.harvard.edu/whatif
NeedsCompilation: no
Materials: README NEWS
CRAN checks: WhatIf results


Reference manual: WhatIf.pdf
Package source: WhatIf_1.5-8.tar.gz
Windows binaries: r-devel: WhatIf_1.5-8.zip, r-release: WhatIf_1.5-8.zip, r-oldrel: WhatIf_1.5-8.zip
OS X El Capitan binaries: r-release: WhatIf_1.5-8.tgz
OS X Mavericks binaries: r-oldrel: WhatIf_1.5-8.tgz
Old sources: WhatIf archive

Reverse dependencies:

Reverse imports: zeligverse
Reverse suggests: MatchIt


Please use the canonical form https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=WhatIf to link to this page.